Background Zanidatamab is a novel HER2-targeted antibody that binds to two non-overlapping extracellular domains of the HER2 receptor. Early-phase trials have shown clinical benefit of first-line Zanidatamab in patients with advanced HER2-positive esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zanidatamab in this patient population. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ASCO, and ESMO databases for studies examining zanidatamab as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS); objective response rate (ORR); disease control rate (DCR); duration of response (DOR); and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Analyses were presented as median or proportions in percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random-effect models were used for analysis, which were carried out using R software (v4.5.2). Results Three clinical trials involving 685 patients with advanced HER2-positive GEA treated with zanidatamab in combination with chemotherapy and/or tislelizumab were included. Overall, the reconstructed pooled median OS was 26.05 months (95% CI: 23.60-30.04), while the pooled median PFS was 12.61 months (95% CI: 11.05–14.60). The pooled ORR was 70% (95% CI, 67–74), DCR was 96% (95% CI, 78–100), and median DOR was 17.11 months (95% CI, 13.07–22.40). Treatment-related diarrhea leading to dose reduction was observed in 16% (95% CI, 1%-75%) of patients. Treatment discontinuation due to any cause rate was 20% (95% CI, 3%-44%). Serious treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 66% (95% CI, 50%-81%) of patients. Common any-grade AEs included diarrhea (89%; 95% CI, 75%-98%), nausea (60%; 95% CI, 45%-74%), and infusion-related reactions (30%; 95% CI, 19%-43%). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, nausea, and treatment-related AEs rates were as follows: 26% (95% CI, 19%-34%), 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%), and 65% (95% CI, 58%-71%), respectively. Other important AEs include immune-mediated AEs (25% incidence rate), left ventricular dysfunction (6% incidence rate), and non-infectious pulmonary toxicity (4% incidence rate). Conclusions Our pooled analyses suggest that zanidatamab exhibits meaningful activity as first-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive GEA. Yet, concerning toxicity rates were also consistently reported across studies. Future randomized studies are needed to further explore its activity and safety profile in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: