Key result
The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was highly effective for preventing sudden cardiac death, with 0% VT/VF deaths over a mean follow-up of 6.7 months.
Why the study?
Malignant ventricular arrhythmias refractory to medical therapy require effective treatment options to prevent sudden cardiac death.
Observational (n=28)
Twenty-eight patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias were treated with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) in a 14-month period. Thirteen patients were resuscitated from a ventricular fibrillation (VF) episode. Fifteen patients presented with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medical therapy. The etiology was coronary artery disease in 23 of 28 patients (82%), dilated cardiomyopathy in 2 of 28 patients (7%), sarcoidosis in 2 of 28 patients, and 1 patient in 28 had lupus erythmatosis. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 29%. A total of 27 of 28 patients (96%) patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia using programmed stimulation. The patients considered for AICD implant failed a mean of 3.6 antiarrhythmic drugs. Rate counting and defibrillating leads were inserted through a lateral thoracotomy in 17 patients and a mediansternotomy incision in 11 patients in conjunction with another cardiac procedure in 10 patients. The generators were positioned in a subcutaneous pocket beneath the left costal margin. There were no operative deaths. The mean follow-up was 6.7 months (range 1 to 14) with no VT/VF deaths in patients with defibrillators. The study demonstrated that AICD is an effective device for prevention of sudden cardiac death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SLATER et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Malignant ventricular arrhythmias (n=28). Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) was evaluated on VT/VF deaths (sudden cardiac death). The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was highly effective for preventing sudden cardiac death, with 0% VT/VF deaths over a mean follow-up of 6.7 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: