Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, the water-soluble bifunctional alkylating agent treosulfan demonstrated broad stem cell toxicity, immunosuppressive as well as antileukemic activity. Due to its well known low non-hematologic toxicity profile, treosulfan was considered an alternative agent for conditioning prior to allogeneic transplantation. A first clinical study, combining 3 x 10 g/m2 of treosulfan with 5 x 30 mg/m2 of fludarabine, demonstrated the feasibility of this conditioning. A fast, reliable and complete development of the donor hematopoiesis was evident as well as a low non-hematologic toxicity, transplantation-related mortality and relapse rate. In a second study treosulfan was escalated from 3 x 10 to 3 x 12 and 3 x 14 g/m2. In this protocol, 55 pts (patients) not amenable to standard conditioning suffering from various hematological malignancies were included. Complete donor chimerism was reached by day 28 in 80% of the pts. So far, 8 pts (11%) died without disease progression and 11 pts (20%) relapsed. Treosulfan was very well tolerated. Especially no hepatic VOD, severe cardiac or pulmonary toxicity was noted. Acute GvHD (degrees 11-IV) occurred in 44% and chronic GvHD in 45% of pts. Considering the poor prognosis of these study populations, treosulfan-based conditioning is considered to be safe and efficient. New phase 11 clinical protocols in AML and MDS will be initiated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casper et al. (2004) studied this question.