Current farm legislation has mandated conservation plans for farms, and maintaining substantial amounts of residue on the soil surface after planting will be a key component in many of those plans. A critical factor in high‐residue systems is N fertilizer management, yet few studies evaluating N management practices for grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production under conservation tillage systems have been reported. Field research was conducted from 1986 through 1989 at two sites to evaluate N rates [0, 50, and 100 lb/acre as urea‐ammonium nitrate (UAN) solution], placement methods (surface broadcast, dribble‐surface band on 20‐in. centers, and knifed‐injected 5‐6 in. deep on 20‐in. centers), and the use of ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) at 10% v/v in UAN as an N management tool in continuous, no‐till, grain sorghum production. Grain yields and N concentrations of leaf tissue and grain were consistently and significantly increased by N fertilization at both sites. When grain yields exceeded 90 bu/acre, 50 lb N/acre was not enough to produce optimum yields. In addition, the 100 lb N/acre rate consistently produced significantly higher grain N concentrations than the 50 lb N/acre rate. Knifed placement of UAN in these high‐residue, conservation‐tillage conditions was superior to broadcast or dribble applications, producing 15 and 10 bu/acre more grain per year than the broadcast and dribble placements, respectively. Knifed placement also consistently produced higher N concentrations in leaf tissue and grain, resulting in much higher apparent N use efficiency. The addition of ATS to UAN produced inconsistent results, but in 2 of 6 site‐years, appeared to favorably affect apparent N use efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamond et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: