This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Mutations in cancer risk genes increase susceptibility, but not all carriers develop cancer. Indeed, while DNA mutations are necessary drivers of cancer, only a small subset of mutated cells go on to cause the disease. To date, the mechanisms underlying individual cancer susceptibility remain unclear. Here, we took advantage of a unique mouse model of intrinsic developmental heterogeneity (Trim28+/D9) to investigate whether early-life epigenetic variation influences cancer susceptibility later in life. We found that heterozygosity of Trim28 is sufficient to generate two distinct early-life epigenetic states associated with differing cancer susceptibility. These developmentally primed states exhibit differential methylation patterns at typically silenced heterochromatin, detectable as early as 10 days of age. The differentially methylated loci are enriched for genes with known oncogenic potential, frequently mutated in human cancers and correlated with poor prognosis. This study provides genetic evidence that intrinsic developmental heterogeneity can prime individual, lifelong cancer susceptibility. Panzeri et al. use a Trim28+/D9 mouse model with intrinsic developmental heterogeneity to show that ‘heavy’ and ‘light’ developmental morphs exhibit different timing, type and severity of cancer, linked to a relevant DNA hypomethylation signature.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panzeri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: