Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic Spot-scanning Proton Arc (SPArc -Dynamic ) therapy has gained attention for enhancing dosimetric plan quality. However, its full clinical implementation remains under development. As an interim milestone, we developed step-and-shoot arc therapy (SPArc -step&shoot ) for head-neck cancer treatment. An in-house spot and energy-layer sparsity optimization algorithm was integrated into a clinical treatment planning system. The algorithm prioritized higher MU-weighted energy layers and spots to ensure delivery efficiency and superior plan quality while meeting machine requirements (≥0.02MU/spot). A Dynamic SPArc simulator calculated delivery times, and a machine-learning-based synthetic CT(synCT) platform monitored dose robustness. In June 2024, a head-neck cancer patient with parotid gland malignancy was treated using SPArc -step&shoot (6600 cGy[relative biological effectiveness] in 33 fx) with 9 static fields at 20-degree intervals. Comparative plans (SFO-IMPT, SPArc -Dynamic ) were evaluated for dose metrics, delivery times, and adaptive planning. SPArc -step&shoot and SPArc -Dynamic showed similar target coverage and organ-at-risks sparing, and the plan quality is superior to the 3-field SFO-IMPT in the brainstem, oral cavity, and spinal cord sparing. The simulated continuous arc delivery time is 15.9, 6.32, and 4.31 minutes for SPArc -step&shoot, SFO-IMPT, and SPArc -Dynamic , respectively. The actual recorded average treatment delivery time for SPArc -step&shoot in 33 fx is 16.7 ± 1.56 minutes. QA-CT and synCT showed a similar target coverage degradation and perturbation, and a replan was initiated. The SPArc -step&shoot therapy was successfully implemented in the clinical settings, and first patient was successfully treated between June and August 2024. The synCT platform serves a critical role in the daily monitoring process as SPArc -Dynamic might be more sensitive to the patient geometry changes in HNC treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: