This research examines the concept of artificial intelligence and robotics across ancient times, where philosophers and scientists in ancient civilizations such as Greece and China sought to imagine beings capable of thinking and interacting, thus embodying humanity's desire to transcend the limits of its biological capabilities. These ideas manifest in mythical figures such as the "Golem" and "Automata" indicating the human preoccupation with the idea of creating intelligent beings. The study is of significant importance by helping us understand the historical roots of the cultural visions that have shaped the concept of artificial intelligence today. It also raises issues regarding the boundaries between myth and reality and what can actually be achieved. These issues relate to human ambitions versus technological possibilities, raising questions about ethics and the necessity of setting limits on these innovations. Additionally, this topic contributes to the analysis of philosophical and cultural thought in human and machine interactions, that strengthens our comprehension of the complex interaction between humans and technology in the contemporary world. Thus, this topic represents a bridge between the past and the future, where ancient myths can help guide us toward a future of artificial intelligence and robotics with a human and ethical character. It is worth noting that the evocation of these ancient visions is not limited to the historical dimension alone, but also opens the way for us to understand how human imagination has always been the primary driving force behind scientific and technological progress. The myths crafted by ancient civilizations were not merely symbolic tales; rather, they constituted an initial framework for reflecting on issues that remain relevant today, such as the boundaries of consciousness, the possibility of simulating the human mind, and the question of what it means to be human. Re-reading these myths in light of current developments in artificial intelligence and robotics offers us an opportunity to reshape our relationship with technology – not merely as a useful tool, but as a cultural and ethical force that demands critical awareness and shared responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed Shaker Alalaq (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: