Mobile payment platforms face a persistent decision-support challenge: payment service providers (PSPs) must identify high-potential merchants from large merchant bases without relying solely on retrospective transaction scale. This study develops an explainable decision-support framework for merchant prioritization by combining growth-trajectory feature engineering, XGBoost classification, and SHAP-based interpretability. Using 61,280 merchant-month records from 3,939 merchants of a leading payment service provider between January 2022 and March 2025, the framework predicts merchant potential while translating model outputs into decision-usable explanations. Merchant potential is operationalized through a polar-group label: merchants in the top 20% of cumulative future gross merchandise value (GMV) over the prediction horizon are treated as high-potential and those in the bottom 20% as low-potential, so the term “high-potential” denotes this top-quantile future-GMV definition rather than current transaction size. To establish methodological rigor, the framework is benchmarked against rule-based, linear, ensemble, and stacking baselines, and a feature-group ablation is conducted to isolate the contribution of trend-sensitive variables. The proposed framework attains strong predictive performance on the held-out test set (AUC = 0.841; AP = 0.868; F1 = 0.783; Precision@100 = 0.91; Lift@40% = 1.61) while outperforming logistic regression, random forest, LightGBM, raw-GMV XGBoost, and rule-based screening on operational precision. SHAP analysis indicates that the nine-month GMV trend slope and the six-month average GMV jointly shape merchant potential, with growth trajectory providing incremental predictive value beyond static scale. The study contributes to merchant analytics by reframing explainability as a structured, auditable decision-support layer rather than as a supplementary visualization. For PSPs, the proposed framework supports transparent merchant prioritization, internal auditability, and targeted resource allocation while avoiding overdependence on opaque prediction scores or simple GMV-based heuristics. As boundary conditions, the results are drawn from a single PSP and a polar-group (top-versus-bottom-quantile) sample rather than the full merchant population, and the decision-support layer is assessed structurally through mapping consistency and rank stability rather than through user studies, formal audits, or measured business outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: