Bathing wastewater-source heat pumps can recover low-grade waste heat, but complex contaminants may cause heat-exchanger fouling and deteriorate heat-transfer performance. This study investigated fouling evolution and control strategies for an immersed copper-tube heat exchanger using physical filtration and composite chemical treatment. Fouling thermal resistance was evaluated using the thermal-resistance difference method and fitted using the Kern–Seaton (KS) and Logistic models. During a 72 h test with untreated wastewater, the overall heat-transfer coefficient decreased by 28.21%, while the overall thermal resistance increased by 39.4%. Baseline filtration at 0.52 mm reduced the steady-state overall thermal resistance by 18.08%, whereas further filtration to 0.25 and 0.04 mm provided limited additional improvement. The Logistic model better described the observed fouling evolution than the KS model, with R 2 increasing from 0.953 to 0.976 and RMSE decreasing by 28.4%. The fitted asymptotic fouling thermal resistance decreased from 5.56 × 10 −4 m 2 ·K/W without filtration to 2.13 × 10 −4 , 1.85 × 10 −4 , and 1.15 × 10 −4 m 2 ·K/W at filtration cut-offs of 0.52, 0.25, and 0.04 mm, respectively. Water-quality indicators suggested a low CaCO₃ scaling tendency and substantial microbial activity in the bulk water; however, these indirect indicators did not establish the dominant fouling mechanism. Orthogonal screening identified a formulation containing 8 mg/L ATMP, 10 mg/L PAA, 30 mg/L GLDA, 30 mg/L TDBAC, and 5 mg/L BTA. Combined with 0.52 mm filtration, this treatment maintained stable heat-transfer performance during a 72 h verification test. These results demonstrate the potential of combining baseline filtration with chemical treatment for fouling control in bathing wastewater heat exchangers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: