Neurological examination and myasthenia gravis (MG)-specific functional scales may not fully capture the psychological and fatigue-related burden of MG. This cross-sectional registry-based study included 75 adults with MG. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) with validated Latvian- and Russian-language thresholds. Fatigue, quality of life, functional impairment and clinical severity were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MG-QOL15), Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and MG Composite Score (MGCS). Analyses included group comparisons, Spearman correlations, and exploratory multivariable linear regression. Positive depression and anxiety screens were identified in 32/75 (42.7%) and 38/75 (50.7%) patients using language-specific thresholds, compared with 25/75 (33.3%) and 18/75 (24.0%) using conventional thresholds, despite low-to-moderate disease activity (median MGCS 3; MG-ADL 1). Depressive symptoms were associated with poorer MG-QOL15, higher MGCS, greater functional impairment and higher anxiety scores, whereas anxiety correlated only weakly with MG-QOL15 (rho = 0.270). Neurological severity alone may underestimate patient-perceived disease burden. Depressive symptoms and fatigue contribute independently to MG-specific quality of life beyond conventional clinical severity assessment, supporting psychological and fatigue screening even in patients with apparent clinical stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ķēniņa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: