Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Magnetorheological polishing (MRP) of K9 glass faces an inherent trade-off: high material removal rate (MRR) versus low surface roughness (Sa), as well as by the strongly nonlinear coupling effects among multiple fluid components. To address this challenge, this study develops a BP neural network-assisted multi-objective optimization framework for reconciling MRR and Sa by optimizing the MRP fluids formulation. A water-based MRP fluid was formulated with variable carbonyl iron (22–62 vol%), polishing powder (4–12 vol%), five abrasives, and pH (2–12). Rheological and single-factor performance tests determined the optimal additive concentrations and revealed the influence of each component on MRR and Sa. A 25-run L 25 (5 6 ) orthogonal experiment provided the training and validation dataset. A three-layer BP neural network (8-10-2 architecture, Levenberg-Marquardt training) was constructed, achieving validation R 2 values of 0.9323 for MRR and 0.9217 for Sa. Using the trained network as the fitness function, the multi-objective crested porcupine optimizer (MOCPO) was compared against MOPSO and MOWOA. MOCPO outperformed the others in hypervolume (2.88 × 10 5 ), IGD (0.025), and spacing (0.048). The Pareto front yielded an optimal formulation: carbonyl iron 52.4 vol%, polishing powder 10.2 vol%, cerium oxide abrasive, and pH 7.5, giving a predicted MRR of 558 nm/min and Sa of 6.6 nm. Three independent validation experiments confirmed the predictions with average errors of 1.14% for MRR and 3.5% for Sa. The proposed BP-MOCPO framework provides a highly accurate and efficient solution for multi-objective optimization of MRP fluids formulation, effectively balancing MRR and Sa for K9 glass polishing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: