Flowchart of the calibration workflow, from plant data and ASM1/BSM1 modelling with 19 parameters, through PRCC screening to 13 and Sobol analysis to 8, to GA and PSO calibration and model validation. This paper presents a hierarchical ASM1 calibration framework applied to the Tlemcen municipal wastewater treatment plant, Algeria, under limited data conditions, using the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 1 (BSM1) implemented in MATLAB/Simulink. This study combines Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC) screening under steady-state conditions and Sobol variance decomposition under dynamic conditions within a sequential sensitivity analysis framework, progressively reducing the parameter space from 19 to 8 influential parameters, prior to dynamic calibration using Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), simultaneously optimizing five output variables: COD, TSS, BOD5, SNO and SNH. Based on 10 independent runs, PSO significantly outperformed GA in solution quality (mean J = 0.3150 ± 0.0001 vs 0.3167 ± 0.0009) and stability, confirmed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.0020). The calibrated model showed good agreement with 2024 measured data (NRMSE <0.40, NMAE <0.41, TIC <0.22). Validation on an independent 2023 dataset confirmed temporal robustness (TIC <0.35). The proposed framework provides a practical decision support tool for aeration management and energy optimization, with potential extensions toward automatic control strategies and digital twin development for similar Algerian WWTPs operating under constrained monitoring conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kloucha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: