We construct an explicit local Lorentzian response geometry with nonzero curvature from two previously separated ingredients: the Fisher–Rao geometry obtained as a hidden-flow quotient of a finite closure–residue system, and a continuous-time population flow induced by a finite-dimensional CPTP/GKSL dynamics. At the uniform four-state cell, the Fisher metric agrees with the metric used in the covariant finite-reclosure construction, and the exact quadratic reclosure map reproduces the constant-curvature Fisher tensor with a fixed coefficient. Transporting Fisher distinguishability by the observable Markov flow gives the unique pullback metric associated with operational tangent covariance. At a reversible stationary point the corresponding shape operator equals the Markov relaxation generator restricted to the probability tangent space. For an explicit anisotropic four-state reversible generator we compute a nonzero Codazzi defect and hence a nonzero mixed Lorentzian Riemann-curvature component. This supplies a finite, exact witness of local Lorentzian response curvature; it is not a derivation of the Einstein field equations, a universal physical light cone, or a global spacetime. We further audit three stronger extensions. First, the reclosure-twist map admits a closed finite-cell formula; under a canonical Fisher-frame identification, torsion-free matching selects the normalization λ = 1. Second, exact microscopic propagation on the natural periodic K4 root lattice is anisotropic, while its quadratic infrared spatial symbol is forced to be Fisher-isotropic. Third, universal coupling and common propagating null branches follow conditionally from a single-master generative completeness principle, while a decoupled spectator construction shows that such completeness is not implied by the preceding finite reclosure results. These stronger statements are kept logically separate from the minimum curvature theorem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsuya Tagawa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: