Regional yield comparisons can complement vineyard experiments but cannot identify causal irrigation responses. We linked Spanish agricultural and hydrological statistics for 70 community-year pairs in 14 communities during 2019–2023. Equal-weight paired differences and joint regressions with regime-specific community and year effects were analyzed using community-level wild cluster bootstrap tests. Confidence intervals used approximate CR1-t inference. Mean irrigated yield exceeded rainfed yield by 1677 kg/ha (95% CI 785–2568; bootstrap p = 0.0013). Per 0.1-unit increase in annual precipitation/reference evapotranspiration (P/ETo), estimated rainfed and irrigated slopes were 307 and −73 kg/ha. Their direct difference was −380 kg/ha (95% CI −1223 to 462; bootstrap p = 0.6306), changing to 104 after excluding Galicia 2023 (bootstrap p = 0.3782). The positive mean yield difference persisted under winsorization and leave-one-community analyses. Evidence for different hydrological slopes remained imprecise and sensitive to influential observations. Annual regional P/ETo does not measure vine water stress, and absent irrigation volumes, management and quality data limit interpretation. The findings establish a descriptive regional yield difference but do not demonstrate physiological buffering, causal irrigation benefits, or greater yield stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Martín et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: