This study presents a comparative analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings under subsurface blast and earthquake loads. Four configurations (6- and 12-story with 3×3 and 3×4 bays) are analyzed. Blast loads use a 3 kg TNT subsurface explosion at 4 m, 7 m, and 10 m standoff in sandy soil. Earthquake loads use ES EN1998-1:2015 response spectra (PGA 0.05 g–2 g, 5% damping). Linear direct integration time-history is used for blast,response spectrum analysis for seismic. Results show that increasing standoff from 4 to 10 m reduces displacements by 85–90%. For the specific scenario studied (3 kg TNT, linear elastic response, sandy soil), displacements at 4 m standoff are comparable to 0.2 g–0.3 g PGA earthquakes (Ground Type A/B, Spectrum Type 1). At 7 m, blast effects are comparable to ~0.1 g PGA; at 10 m, displacements fall below 0.05 g PGA. Additional response parameters (base shear, acceleration, and modal periods) show that this displacement-based comparison does not extend to other design metrics. These findings are limited to linear elastic global displacement comparison and do not constitute a general equivalence for blast-resistant design. Nonlinear material response, larger charge weights, and soil–structure interaction require further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yisayas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: