High-performance Cu–Cr–X copper alloys face an inherent trade-off between mechanical strength and electrical conductivity. This study develops a physics-informed, interpretable machine-learning framework for their optimization and inverse design. A literature-derived dataset of 3017 experimental records was compiled, with 2302 records retained after preprocessing and reliability filtering. Metallurgically motivated descriptors, including Aging Severity, Cold Work Index, Cr–Aging interaction, Zener-pinning and Hall–Petch proxies, and source reliability, were incorporated. Random Forest, Extra Trees, XGBoost, and CatBoost were evaluated using a leakage-free 10-fold out-of-fold stacking framework. The stacking model achieved R 2 = 0.895, MAE = 17.3, and RMSE = 48.7, compared with R 2 values of 0.781, 0.802, 0.837, and 0.857, respectively, for the four base learners. SHAP analysis highlighted Cu, Cr, source reliability, aging-related variables, and precipitation-related descriptors as important predictors. Pareto-based inverse screening identified candidates with predicted Strength Index values exceeding 520 and approaching 580, with conductivity reaching approximately 95 %IACS. The framework provides a data-driven route for narrowing the Cu–Cr–X design space, while the predicted candidates require experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aswin Karkadakattil (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: