Purpose: Deep learning can accelerate radiotherapy dose prediction, but particle-therapy datasets remain scarce. We evaluated whether a physics-informed ensemble trained exclusively on photon plans could predict proton and carbon-ion dose distributions without particle-dose training.Methods: Using matRad, 90 reference plans (photons, protons and carbon ions) were generated for five anatomies and six beam configurations. A 13-channel tensor combining CT, structure masks and modality-specific ray-tracing/depth-dose channels was input to SOTA-UNet3D, Res-UNet3D and Trans-UNet3D; their voxel-wise mean formed the Voltron ensemble. Leave-one-anatomy-out evaluation used four test anatomies with photon-only training. Performance was assessed with PyMedPhys gamma analysis (3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm; 10% low-dose threshold) and mean absolute error (MAE).Results: Across four held-out anatomies, mean 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates were 23.5% for photons, 23.3% for protons and 21.5% for carbon ions; 2%/2 mm rates were 15.8%, 15.5% and 14.5%. Mean MAE was approximately 5.2–5.3 Gy. Gamma values reported in an earlier version of this work (73.2/70.8/69.1%) were computed with a non-standard lenient criterion; all values reported here use the standard gamma index.Conclusion: Photon-only training with physics-informed inputs provides a reproducible feasibility baseline for zeroshot particle-dose prediction. Performance is not clinical-grade, but the small cross-modality degradation suggests that anatomical and geometric features learned from photon data can transfer to particle therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammed Emin Bedir (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: