Effective wound-fluid management is essential in medical applications, as dressings must absorb, retain, and regulate excess blood, exudate, and other biological fluids. Gelatin-hyaluronic acid (Gel/HA) hydrogels are promising dressing materials because they provide a hydrated, tissue-mimetic environment and combine the biological functions of both polymers. Their performance depends strongly on the crosslinking strategy, which regulates network architecture, fluid transport, and mechanical integrity. Three Gel/HA networks were prepared by physical association (Network I), glutaraldehyde-mediated covalent crosslinking (Network II), and PEGDA-mediated interpenetrating-network formation (Network III). Molecular interactions, morphology, fluid uptake, and mechanical properties were evaluated within a structure-transport-function framework. The networks exhibited distinct pore structures, with average pore sizes of 21 ± 7, 2.3 ± 0.8, and 9 ± 3 μm and porosities of 74 ± 3, 59 ± 3, and 67 ± 3% for Networks I-III, respectively. Tensile strength increased from 62 ± 5 kPa for Network I to 127 ± 7 kPa for Network II and 215 ± 9 kPa for Network III, while elongation at break increased from 152 ± 9 to 257 ± 12 and 343 ± 14%, respectively. Simulated blood uptake at 240 min reached 483 ± 45, 842 ± 59, and 1285 ± 72% for Networks I-III, respectively. An integrated hydrogel performance index was used as a comparative dimensionless descriptor of selected transport and mechanical properties. Overall, the results show that network formulation yields distinct combinations of pore architecture, fluid transport, and mechanical performance, providing a basis for comparing Gel/HA hydrogel designs for wound management applications that balance fluid management and mechanical properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: