We discuss the applicability of two different near field representations of seismic input within the capacity-demand diagram method for seismic performance assessment of classes of buildings in urban areas. The two representations of seismic input used are: (1) synthetic accelerograms obtained from 3D wave simulations of random rupture scenarios are used to estimate seismic risk, through the Monte-Carlo approximation; and (2) random realizations of elastic spectral displacement obtained through ground-motion prediction equations. The implementation of the proposed formulation in evaluating the seismic performance of two classes of buildings in the town of Sulmona, Italy, indicates that empirical ground-motion prediction equations, combined with non-iterative methods for estimating the inelastic seismic demand, can produce results comparable to the physics-based simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demartinos et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: