Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dye-laden wastewater released from industries is a critical source of water pollution. Although electrocoagulation (EC) is widely used for dye-containing wastewater treatment, its performance can vary depending on dye characteristics, particularly ionic nature. This study evaluates the EC treatment of two dyes with opposite ionic charges: anionic Congo red (CR) and cationic Methylene blue (MB), using aluminium electrodes. The effects of initial dye concentration (10–50 ppm), current density CD (5–25 mA/cm²), pH (5–9), NaCl dosage (0.25–1.25 g/L), and contact time (10–60 min) were investigated. Under optimum conditions, CR achieved 90.5% removal at a CD of 5 mA/cm², NaCl dosage of 1 g/L, contact time of 30 min, pH 7, and initial concentration of 40 ppm. MB achieved 43.4% removal at CD of 7.5 mA/cm², 1.25 g/L NaCl, 50 min, pH 8, and initial concentration of 10 ppm. Kinetic analysis indicated pseudo-second-order behaviour for CR (R² = 0.9939) and pseudo-first-order behaviour for MB (R² = 0.921). SEM, EDX, FTIR, and XRD analyses of the generated sludge revealed differences in their removal mechanisms. The operating costs were $0.755/m³ for CR and $1.523/m³ for MB . Overall, the findings demonstrate that dye ionic nature influences removal efficiency, treatment requirements, and operating cost during EC treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lekshmi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: