Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrophilic iodination and bromination (X2–AlCl3) of nido-7-Me3N-7-CB10H12 gave nido-4-I-7-Me3N-7-CB10H11 and nido-4,6-I2-7-Me3N-7-CB10H10 and the bromine-substituted analogues nido-4-Br-7-Me3N-7-CB10H11 and nido-4,6-Br2-7-Me3N-7-CB10H10. Electrophilically induced nucleophilic substitution (HI–AlCl3) gave nido-9-I-7-Me3N-7-CB10H10. These compounds readily deprotonated to the dianions [nido-7-Me3N-7-CB10H10]2–, [nido-4-I-7-Me3N-7-CB10H9]2– and [nido-4,6-I2-7-Me3N-7-CB10H8]2–, and oxidation (chemical or electrochemical) gave derivatives of closo-2-Me3N-2-CB10H10 and closo-3-I-2-Me3N-2-CB10H9. Low temperature insertion reactions of the anions with PhBCl2 gave closo-8-I-2-Ph-1-Me3N-1-CB11H9 and closo-8-Br-2-Ph-1-Me3N-1-CB11H9, while electrophilic iodination occurred at B(12) to give closo-12-I-1-Me3N-1-CB11H10. Palladium catalysed substitution of iodine resulted in the nido and closo derivatives closo-8-CH2CHCH2-2-Ph-1-Me3N-1-CB11H9 and nido-4-CH2CHCH2-7-Me3N-7-CB10H11. AM1 Calculations were used to help rationalise a mechanism for the boron insertion reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: