Key result
Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NSIVCD) was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular composite outcomes (HR 1.716) compared to no conduction delay in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
The prognosis and clinical significance of left and right bundle branch block in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy at NYHA classes I and II were not well characterized.
Cohort (n=548)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The survival of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) at III and IV stages of New York Heart Association (NYHA) is decreased in those with a bundle branch block (BBB) compared to those without BBB. Less is known on the prognosis of patients at earlier stages of NYHA and who had a left BBB (LBBB) or right BBB (RBBB). We sought to evaluate the prevalence and the clinical significance of LBBB or RBBB in patients with IDCM and classes I and II of NYHA. METHODS: Clinical data, noninvasive, and invasive studies were consecutively collected in 310 patients, with IDCM, followed up to 4.8+/-3.7 years. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (25%) had LBBB, 21 (7%) had RBBB, and 212 had no BBB. Patients with BBB were older than other patients (P < 0.009). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in LBBB than in RBBB and other patients (P < 0.05). Syncope was more frequent in BBB than in absence (P < 0.05). Incidence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) and atrial fibrillation, VT induction, total cardiac events, and sudden death were similar in the presence or absence of BBB. Deaths by heart failure and heart transplantations tended to be more frequent in BBB than in absence. CONCLUSIONS: LBBB was present in 25% of patients with IDCM; RBBB was rare. Patients with BBB were older and had more frequent syncope than patients without BBB; LVEF was lower in LBBB than in RBBB or in absence of BBB. BBB did not increase the risk of spontaneous VT, VT induction, or sudden death, and tended to increase deaths by heart failure and the indications of heart transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brembilla-Perrot et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=548). Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NSIVCD) vs. No intraventricular conduction delay was evaluated on Composite of sudden cardiac death, heart failure death, heart transplantation, LV assist device installation, malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and appropriate shocks of ICD or CRT-D (HR 1.716, 95% CI 1.092-2.854, p=<0.001). Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NSIVCD) was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular composite outcomes (HR 1.716) compared to no conduction delay in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: