Key result
Low working memory load is linked to better distractor inhibition under high anxiety.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether impairments in inhibition of distraction and attentional focus under anxiety are reduced or exacerbated by loading working memory with non-affective information, and how vagal control relates to this process.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low WM load may aid inhibition under acute anxiety; hypothesis-generating for load optimization in anxiety disorders.
Anxiety impairs both inhibition of distraction and attentional focus. It is unclear whether these impairments are reduced or exacerbated when loading working memory with non-affective information. Cardiac vagal control has been related to top-down regulation of anxiety; therefore, vagal control may reflect load-related inhibition of distraction under anxiety. The present study examined whether: (1) the enhancing and impairing effects of load on inhibition exist together in a non-linear function, (2) there is a similar association between inhibition and concurrent vagal control under anxiety. During anxiogenic threat-of-noise, 116 subjects maintained a digit series of varying lengths (0, 2, 4, and 6 digits) while completing a visual flanker task. The task was broken into four blocks, with a baseline period preceding each. Electrocardiography was acquired throughout to quantify vagal control as high-frequency heart rate variability (HRV). There were significant quadratic relations of working memory load to flanker performance and to HRV, but no associations between HRV and performance. Results indicate that low load was associated with relatively better inhibition and increased HRV. These findings suggest that attentional performance under anxiety depends on the availability of working memory resources, which might be reflected by vagal control. These results have implications for treating anxiety disorders, in which regulation of anxiety can be optimized for attentional focus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spangler et al. (2017) studied Healthy (Induced State Anxiety) (n=116). Working memory load vs. No load (0 digits) was evaluated on Inhibition performance (Flanker task incongruent minus congruent RT) under threat (Unstandardized B = -1.31 (quadratic effect), p=0.038). Low working memory load (2 digits) was associated with relatively better distractor inhibition compared to no load or higher load under high state anxiety (quadratic B = -1.31, p=0.038).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: