Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine which financial record‐keeping system farmers use, as well as what system attributes farmers value and to what degree. Design/methodology/approach This research uses a choice experiment to examine farmer's demand for attributes of financial record‐keeping systems. A sample from the general Michigan farm population is compared to samples from university and agribusiness record system clients. Findings Results reveal that university and agribusiness clients are willing to pay considerably more for a farm‐specific record system to backstop their farm management decisions. Practical implications The results provide an understanding of farmer demands for farm financial record systems and can be used to position record‐keeping systems to meet those demands. Originality/value This paper describes and analyzes farm financial accounting system use and preferences by type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolf et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: