Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is a pivotal feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet spirometry has limited sensitivity for peripheral airway impairment. Oscillometry offers effort-independent assessment of respiratory mechanics during tidal breathing. We systematically reviewed longitudinal studies reporting the association between baseline oscillometry and subsequent moderate-to-severe acute exacerbations (AE) in COPD. Ratio estimates (OR, HR, IRR) were pooled using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model, with sensitivity analyses for effect metric, follow-up, study quality and estimate selection. Six studies (1,317 unique patients; follow-up 1–5 years) met inclusion criteria, and four independent cohorts ( n = 1,236) contributed to the meta-analysis. Oscillometry-defined SAD was associated with a higher risk of moderate-to-severe AE (pooled estimate 2.28, 95% CI 1.77–2.94; I² = 0%; 95% prediction interval 1.31–3.98). The association persisted when restricted to hazard and rate ratios (2.23, 95% CI 1.67–2.98) and when the lowest available estimate from each study was pooled (1.60, 95% CI 1.16–2.22). Evidence on discrimination relative to FEV₁ was limited to a single cohort, in which R5–R20 and FEV₁ performed similarly (AUC 0.775 vs. 0.777). Within this small evidence base, oscillometry-defined SAD was associated with exacerbation risk; larger cohorts should define outcome-anchored thresholds and incremental value over spirometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: