Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dengue remains a major public health challenge in Thailand, with substantial geographic variation. This study analyzed national dengue surveillance data (2005–2024; 1,640,368 cases) across five consecutive 4-year intervals to identify spatial clustering patterns, detect space-time clusters, and characterize the evolution of high-risk areas. Province-level pooled incidence rates were assessed using Global Moran’s I, Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), and SaTScan space-time scan statistics with discrete Poisson models. Global Moran’s I showed significant positive spatial autocorrelation in four periods (I = 0.211–0.473, p < 0.01) but not during 2017–2020 (I = 0.065, p = 0.190), indicating spatial fragmentation. LISA revealed a progressive decline in High-High cluster provinces from 11 to 2 and a geographic shift from Central-Eastern to Northern Thailand. SaTScan detected 13 statistically significant clusters; the most likely cluster occurred in Northern Thailand (2013–2016, relative risk = 2.33, p < 0.001). The cluster with the highest cumulative burden encompassed the Central-Western region (2009–2016, 149,010 cases). Dengue exhibits dynamically evolving geographic patterns, with Northern Thailand emerging as the primary high-risk area requiring priority intervention. These findings support geographically stratified control strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sornlorm et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: