Conventional display metrology relies on stationary CMOS frame cameras or single-point photodiodes to evaluate display flicker and spatial image quality. While suitable for characterizing deep Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) luminance dips, stationary camera sensors fundamentally fail to capture the neuro-ophthalmic load induced by sub-LSB Temporal Frame Rate Control (FRC) dithering and bit-depth quantization banding. A conventional camera sensor integrates photons linearly over a fixed exposure window on a static pixel grid. Conversely, the human visual system processes light through dual parallel retinal pathways (Parvocellular sustained integration and Magnocellular transient differentiation) coupled with horizontal-cell lateral inhibition during continuous oculomotor motion [1, 2, 3]. This paper presents two contributions to display metrology and visual ergonomics: A hardware specification for a Biomimetic Retinal Sensor (Mixed-Signal CMOS-MEMS ASIC) incorporating parallel Parvocellular (P) and Magnocellular (M) analog pixel branches, an on-chip Center-Surround lateral inhibition grid, and an active MEMS oculomotor smooth-pursuit optical stage [8, 9]. A Software Digital Twin implemented in CUDA C++ that emulates this retinal architecture on high-speed video captures or raw display composition framebuffers, computing three objective biophysical metrics: the Magnocellular Flicker Fatigue Index (MFFI), Cortical Mach Band Load (CMBL), and Retinal Dynamic Pursuit Instability (RDPI) [10].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michal Mazgal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: