Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Palliative radiotherapy is commonly used to control bleeding in advanced gastric cancer; however, the optimal dose-fractionation regimen as well as the dose-response relationship remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy for gastric cancer-related bleeding and its association with dose fractionation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web for studies published between January 2000 and August 2026 on palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer-related bleeding. The primary endpoint was bleeding response rate. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled response rates. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore dose-response relationships. Meta-regression was performed using study-level median biologically effective dose (BED) values. Egger's test suggested small study effects (P = 0.012). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated an association between a higher BED and an increased likelihood of response (P = 0.010). Subgroup analyses showed that higher BED categories were associated with higher response rates (P = 0.005). The pooled rebleeding rate was 32.4%. The median overall survival and rebleeding-free survival were 3.8 and 3.4 months, respectively. Radiotherapy was generally well tolerated, with a low incidence of grade ≥ 3 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for gastric cancer-related bleeding. Although study-level meta-regression identified a statistical association between higher BED and hemostatic response, this may largely reflect selection bias and methodological limitations rather than a true dose-response relationship. Given the poor prognosis of this population, shorter dose-fractionation regimens are appropriate for many patients, whereas higher-BED regimens remain reasonable for selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iguchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: