This experimental study investigated the shear capacity, load–deflection behavior, and failure modes of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) deep beams incorporating single-type and dual-geometry steel fibers. Eleven SFRC deep beams, with and without traditional shear reinforcement, were tested under four-point loading to examine the effect of steel fiber (SF) content, shape, and combination on shear performance. SF volume fractions of 0.0%, 0.7%, 1.05%, and 1.4% (by cement weight) were evaluated across three fiber configurations: hooked-end fibers, crimped fibers, and a 50/50 dual-geometry combination of both. Conventional shear reinforcement was also tested to serve as a benchmark. Results showed that shear strength and ductility increased consistently with fiber content, with load-carrying capacity reaching 165–211% of the unreinforced control beam and 111–140% of the beam with conventional shear reinforcement. Failure has been shifted from a sudden, brittle diagonal-shear mode in the unreinforced beam toward more gradual, ductile failure as fiber content increased, accompanied by finer crack widths and more distributed cracking. While both single-type fibers performed effectively as standalone shear reinforcement, the dual-geometry combination of hooked-end and crimped fibers outperformed either single type in ultimate strength and ductility, indicating a synergistic effect between fiber geometries. This dual-geometry approach offers a novel strategy for optimizing fiber-reinforced shear design in deep beams, particularly where enhanced ductility and crack control are needed without relying solely on conventional shear reinforcement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahdi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: