The Yellowstone permutation (OEIS A098550) is defined by a(1), a(2), a(3) = 1, 2, 3 and, for n >= 4, a(n) is the least positive integer not yet used with gcd(a(n), a(n-2)) > 1 and gcd(a(n), a(n-1)) = 1. Applegate, Havermann, Selcoe, Shevelev, Sloane and Zumkeller (2015) proved that it is a permutation of the positive integers; its growth was described only empirically. We prove the near-linear bound a(n) <= n (ln n)^7 for every n >= 3, and a(n) <= n (ln n)^6 for ln n >= 73.5, as well as the elementary form a(n) <= n 2^(4 ln n / ln ln n) for every n >= 3. The method is a fixed-time iteration: the anchor a(n-2) of a large term determines the term, the primes of the anchor are forced to have many used multiples in a short window below the term, and a Bonferroni count shows that such heavy primes are too few to supply all the anchors. The coprimality input is a self-contained explicit form of Brun's sieve. The explicit constants are computer-assisted: the first 10^8 terms, and a finite list of explicit inequalities checked on cells of ln n in [ln 10^8, 10^40]; beyond ln n = 10^40 the proof is by hand. OEIS Conjecture 7, a(n) <= (pi/2) n ln n, remains open. Manuscript; not submitted to a journal. The results were developed with an AI system (Anthropic Claude) and checked by independent AI referee agents; no human peer review has taken place.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomer Haver (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: