Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) are central to modern environmental remediation, yet they remain nearly absent from undergraduate physical chemistry and environmental chemistry curricula. This work reports a four-week capstone course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) on the electrocatalytic degradation of refractory organic pollutants, rhodamine B, methylene blue, and levofloxacin model effluents, implemented at a regional Chinese university across four academic years (2022–2025; n = 86). Each team fabricates a Ti/SnO2–Sb2O3 dimensionally stable anode and applies it across three competing EAOP variants (continuous anodic oxidation, continuous electro-Fenton, and pulsed-current electro-Fenton), organized under a “Research → Competition → Entrepreneurship” pedagogy mapped onto the five-feature CURE schema. Authentic effluent samples and horizontal-research funding supplied by four wastewater-treatment partner companies generate a financial closed loop that decouples the laboratory from fluctuating institutional budgets. The primary task-based measure, cohort mean scores on a 13-criterion analytic rubric, rose from 74.1/100 (Cohort 2022) to 85.6/100 (Cohort 2025), with the largest gains in mechanistic reasoning, kinetic data analysis, and linkage of results to the partner company context. A 14-item pre/post Likert questionnaire, used as supplementary triangulation, showed self-efficacy gains consistent with the rubric results. Downstream outputs include student first-authored papers in indexed environmental science journals, multiple provincial- and national-level innovation awards, and one student-led environmental technology startup. A laboratory instructor guide that includes the rubric, the bilingual pre/post questionnaire, hazard documentation, a line-item cost breakdown, and a step-by-step adaptation guide is provided in the Supporting Information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: