This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
One-anastomosis transit bipartition (OATB) has emerged as a metabolic procedure that combines functional restriction and diversion mechanisms while preserving endoscopic access to the remnant stomach. With increasing interest in minimally invasive approaches, the application of single-port laparoscopy in bariatric surgery has gained attention. However, the feasibility of performing one-anastomosis transit bipartition through a single-port approach remains rarely reported. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 16 patients who underwent single-port one-anastomosis transit bipartition (SP-OATB) between February 2024 and January 2026 at a single center. All procedures were conducted by the same surgical team. Baseline demographic and metabolic data were collected. Weight-loss outcomes, metabolic parameters, perioperative outcomes, and cosmetic results assessed by the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale were evaluated during follow-up. Among patients with available follow-up data, mean total weight loss (TWL%) and excess weight loss (EWL%) at 12 months were 33.07% and 90.21%, respectively. Improvements in several metabolic parameters, including fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c, were observed during follow-up. No major postoperative complications, reoperations, or readmissions occurred. At the 1-month follow-up, the mean SCAR score among the 14 evaluated patients was 4.2 ± 3.4. SP-OATB appears technically feasible and was associated with favorable perioperative outcomes in selected patients, with no major postoperative complications, reoperations, or readmissions observed in this series. Encouraging early weight-loss outcomes and cosmetic outcomes were also observed. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and reproducibility of this approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: