Key result
Ruptured culprit plaques show thinner fibrous caps, higher plaque burden, and smaller lumens than nonruptured TCFAs.
Why the study?
It remains unknown whether certain morphological characteristics determine rupture of thin-cap fibroatheroma and subsequently result in acute coronary syndromes.
Do specific morphological characteristics measured by OCT and IVUS distinguish ruptured culprit plaques from ruptured nonculprit plaques and nonruptured TCFA in patients with ACS?
Cross-Sectional (n=82)
Do specific morphological characteristics measured by OCT and IVUS distinguish ruptured culprit plaques from ruptured nonculprit plaques and nonruptured TCFA in patients with ACS?
Fibrous cap thickness distinguishes ruptured from nonruptured plaques, while a combination of greater plaque burden and luminal narrowing specifically characterizes the ruptured culprit plaques responsible for acute coronary syndromes.
Objectives The study sought to identify specific morphological characteristics of ruptured culprit plaques (RCP) responsible for acute events, and compare them with ruptured nonculprit plaques (RNCP) and nonruptured thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Background Nonruptured TCFA and multiple ruptured plaques are detected in the same patients with ACS. It remains unknown whether certain morphological characteristics determine rupture of TCFA and subsequently result in ACS. Methods We analyzed 126 plaques (RCP = 49, RNCP = 19, TCFA = 58) from 82 ACS patients using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Fibrous cap thickness was determined by OCT. Plaque burden and lumen area were measured with IVUS. Results Fibrous cap was thinner in RCP (43 ± 11 μm) and RNCP (41 ± 10 μm) than in TCFA (56 ± 9 μm, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Plaque burden was greater in RCP (82 ± 7.2%), compared with RNCP (64 ± 7.2%, p < 0.001) and TCFA (62 ± 12.5%, p < 0.001). Lumen area was smaller in RCP (2.1 ± 0.9 mm(2)), compared with RNCP (4.6 ± 2.3 mm(2), p = 0.001) and TCFA (5.1 ± 2.7 mm(2), p < 0.001). The fibrous cap thickness <52 μm had good performance in discriminating ruptured plaque from TCFA (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.857, p < 0.001), and plaque burden >76% and lumen area <2.6 mm(2) had good performance in discriminating RCP from RNCP and TCFA (AUC = 0.923, p < 0.001 and AUC = 0.881, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions Fibrous cap thickness is a critical morphological discriminator between ruptured plaques and nonruptured TCFA, while plaque burden and lumen area appear to be important morphological features of RCP. These findings suggest that plaque rupture is determined by fibrous cap thickness, and a combination of large plaque burden and luminal narrowing result in ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (n=82). Ruptured culprit plaques (RCP) vs. Ruptured nonculprit plaques (RNCP) and nonruptured thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was evaluated on Discrimination of ruptured plaque from TCFA using fibrous cap thickness <52 μm (AUC 0.857, p=<0.001). Ruptured culprit plaques had thinner fibrous caps (43 vs 56 μm), greater plaque burden (82% vs 62%), and smaller lumen areas (2.1 vs 5.1 mm2) than nonruptured TCFAs (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: