Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Third-generation parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays have been reported to measure only intact PTH(1-84), in contrast to second-generation assays, which also detect PTH(7-84) fragments. Higher PTH measurements were observed with third- than with second-generation PTH assays in a few patients with either severe primary hyperparathyroidism or parathyroid carcinoma. METHODS: We analyzed biological data [second- and third-generation PTH assays, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), calcium, and phosphate concentrations] obtained before and after surgery for 2 groups of patients selected from a large series of consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT): 7 female patients with surgically and histologically confirmed PHPT (group 1) and a matched group (group 2). RESULTS: For group 1 but not group 2, PTH concentrations measured by third-generation PTH assays before surgery were higher than those measured by the second-generation assays. Circulating 25-OHD, calcium, and phosphate concentrations were similar in both groups. In addition, PTH values measured with the third-generation PTH assays in group 1 decreased after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that third-generation PTH assays do not measure only PTH(1-84). The frequency of this unexpected finding of markedly lower PTH concentrations than previously reported was approximately 5% in patients with PHPT without malignancy. We do not know whether the presence of this unexpected profile is predictive of malignancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boudou et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: