Key result
Indolimus sirolimus-eluting stent shows a ~4.5% 1-year MACE rate in registry data.
Why the study?
The prolonged safety and efficacy of the Indolimus sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system required evaluation.
Observational (n=530)
No
Low MACE rates seen with Indolimus SES in real-world registry; leaves open need for randomized trials versus contemporary stents.
BACKGROUND: The main aim is to evaluate prolonged safety and efficacy of the Indolimus (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system. METHODS: It was a single center, non randomized, retrospective registry. Out of total 530 patients involved in the INDOLIMUS Registry, follow-up of 523 patients were obtained at 1-year The primary end-point of this was major adverse cardiac events, which is a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Cardiac death, target lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction at 1-year were reported in 19 (3.6%), 2 (0.4%), and 2 (0.4%) patients respectively, while stent thrombosis was reported in 1 (0.2%) patient. The resultant major adverse cardiac events at 1-year were reported to be 24 (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The lower incidence of MACE in uncontrolled and more complex cohorts at 1-year follow-up clearly depicts the prolonged safety and efficacy of the Indolimus sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajasekhar et al. (2015) reported an observational. Indolimus sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system was evaluated on major adverse cardiac events, which is a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. The Indolimus sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system was associated with a 1-year major adverse cardiac event rate of 4.5% in a retrospective registry.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: