This addendum to De Defectu Fundamenti advances the original epistemological inquiry by anchoring its philosophical paradigms within contemporary frameworks from the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR). Specifically, this addendum translates the phenomenon of "Structural Vertigo" from a macroscopic, socio-epistemic pathology into a precise neurological failure of anticipatory modeling, demonstrating how hyper-abundant, unanchored data generates insurmountable cognitive entropy. Moving beyond the assertion that human psychology possesses a mere affective affinity for transcendent narratives, this paper synthesizes a heptapartite cognitive composite: Predictive Processing, Active Inference, the Meaning Maintenance Model (MMM), Promiscuous Teleology, Intuitive Dualism, Agency Detection, and the Big Gods prosociality metric. These seven mechanisms are deployed across three distinct analytical vectors to evaluate contemporary epistemological frameworks. First, the inquiry exposes the evolutionary unviability of the Rationalist Reduction (Path A), demonstrating that horizontalized, purely physicalist ethical architectures are structurally incapable of sustaining large-scale human cooperation. Second, it diagnoses Dogmatic Harmonization (Path B) as a maladaptive entropy-minimization error, wherein the deliberate suppression of empirical anomalies generates a brittle, computationally exhausted framework. Ultimately, this tri-vector analysis fortifies the pragmatic, existential posture of Chastened Discipleship (Path C). It posits that the intentional adoption of a hyper-prior is not an abdication of empirical rigor, but rather an evolutionary and neurological necessity for cognitive stabilization and systemic structural integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brice A. Williams (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: