Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Basel IRB capital function rests on the asymptotic single-risk-factor (ASRF) model: a single systematic factor drives defaults and the portfolio is infinitely granular. I derive the function from a Merton firm-value model, proving the default-threshold result with Itô's lemma and the Vasicek limiting loss distribution with a conditional law of large numbers. I verify the 99.9% quantile against Monte Carlo and test the ASRF assumptions for a loan book concentrated in a few districts, as is typical of an Indian regional rural bank. At PD = 5% and LGD = 45%, the Basel "other retail" function (correlation 0.053; formula as published by the BCBS) gives K = 5.31% of exposure. Finite granularity matters little above about 1,000 borrowers. District concentration matters a great deal. With asset correlation 0.15 within a district and 0.05 across districts, unexpected loss at the 99.9% level is 2.23 times K for a single-district book, 1.42 times for three districts and 1.11 times for ten. PD, LGD and correlation values are scenarios, not estimates for any named bank. As context, the RBI reports a 5.1% gross NPA ratio for agricultural loans of scheduled commercial banks in March 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manoj Kumar Aguru (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: