How can a balanced comparison be selected in a uniform linear extension of a finite poset, and when does it survive deletion? This working paper develops exact mechanisms toward the 1/3–2/3 conjecture. Principal results Geometric deletion-count selectors and extremal correlation give quantitative balanced pairs and complete retaining deletion chains in several structural classes, including every width-two nonchain. A maximal antichain of size w contains a balanced pair when w ≥ 5k, where each member has at most k exterior incomparabilities. The proof retains its structural inputs and 65 exact arithmetic certificates. For a maximal element whose incomparable neighbours form a chain, a balanced partner exists exactly when 2e(P) ≥ 3e(P−z). This also gives sharp preservation of half-probability card pairs. An unconditioned ideal-cut selection criterion is proved for every width-two nonchain. Exact named-core and matching-fibre decompositions identify the exterior weights and currents needed beyond conditional selection. Methods and scope The methods combine order-polytope geometry, entropy, exact insertion counts, correlation inequalities, ideal conductances, swap currents, and rational certificates. Explicit uniform-poset examples and nonuniform-law obstructions delimit localized cuts, prescribed-card menus, and correlation or moment relaxations. Open questions The unrestricted 1/3–2/3 conjecture, universal deletion lifting, and a common comparison-charge construction of total coefficient at most three remain open. The project contains both manuscripts, editable sources, complete code and certificates, proof reviews, and the preceding material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K. Fathi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: