This multi-method study explored factors influencing parental adherence to prevention strategies for positional cranial asymmetry (CA), specifically plagiocephaly and brachycephaly. Parents of newborns (N = 218) completed a 39-question online survey using 7-point Likert-type items and responded to one open-ended question. Survey development was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capacity, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behavior (COM-B). The open-ended question (n = 112) aimed to capture the main barriers hindering parental adherence. Descriptive analysis of item ratings and deductive-inductive theming of open-ended responses were synthesized. Survey findings underscored factors related to six COM-B subdomains-psychological and physical capability, social and environmental opportunity, and automatic and reflective motivation-influenced parental adherence. Open-ended responses revealed six overarching themes: (1) comprehensive detailed information, (2) infant's limited tolerance for prone position, (3) parental-related adjustment factors, (4) time and household management, (5) access to reliable resources, and (6) social support. This study highlights key factors influencing parental adherence to CA prevention, including a need for clear information, social support, and practical strategies for busy households. Addressing these barriers may enhance adherence and improve prevention efforts and newborn outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trottier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: