Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Eddy-current brake dynamometers are widely used in engineering technology education as load-setting test beds, yet their torque output exhibits hysteresis that is rarely quantified against a traceable reference. The framework treats the brake as a saturable magnetic circuit and derives a closed-form expression for the hysteresis loop width as a function of excitation current, disc permeability and air-gap reluctance. A calibration protocol is specified in which a reference torque arm and a strain-gauge load cell establish the ascending and descending torque-current branches, from which a repeatability bound is computed at the 95% coverage level. The analysis is methodological and does not report empirical measurements; instead, it formalises the conditions under which hysteresis becomes the dominant contributor to load-setting uncertainty and derives the excitation range over which the bound remains within a stated tolerance. The principal contribution is a design-stage procedure that allows educators and technicians to predict whether a given eddy-current dynamometer can meet a specified repeatability target before a laboratory exercise is commissioned. The framework is intended to support the accreditation of test beds used in mechanical and electrical engineering technology curricula.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osei-Bonsu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: