The controller placement problem (CPP) is one of the key challenges of software defined networks (SDNs) to increase performance. Given the locations of n switches, CPP consists of choosing the controller locations that minimize the latency between switches and SDN controllers. In its current form, however, CPP assumes a fixed traffic and no existing solutions adapt the placement to the load. In this paper, we have addressed the dynamic CPP that consists of: 1) determining the locations of controller modules to bound communication latencies and 2) determining the number of controllers per module to support the dynamic load. We propose an algorithm named LiDy+ that runs in O(n2) and combines a controller module placement algorithm with a dynamic flow management algorithm. We evaluate the number of controllers, the controller utilization, and the power consumption and the maintenance cost of LiDy+ on both sparse and dense networks. Our comparison against a previous solution shows that LiDy+ does not only achieve a smaller number of controllers and a higher controller utilization but also incurs less energy and maintenance costs than the previous solution. Finally, we run LiDy+ in a large-scale environment where the previous solution of time complexity Ω(n2logn) is impractical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huque et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: