Key result
Real-time integrated backscatter measurement yields ~-54 dB, matching earlier off-line systems in dogs.
Why the study?
A real-time system for quantitative myocardial tissue characterization using integrated backscatter ultrasound was needed to improve clinical applicability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Confirms real-time integrated backscatter equivalence in dogs; leaves open human validation before clinical use.
Abstmct-To quantify integrated backscatter of ultrasound for realtime tissue characterization of myocardium in vivo an analog system that is used in conjunction with a two-dimensionaliM-mode echocardingraphic imager was developed and evaluated. The system measures the energy contained in a portion of the received rf signal from a selected myocardial segment with a CdS acoustoelectric detector. A standard substitution technique is used to calibrate the system relative to a stainless steel reflector. Integrated backscatter is sampled at 5 ms intervals, its time-variation recorded and simultaneously integrated to yield the time-averaged integrated backscatter. Both time-varying and time-averaged integrated backscatter are displayed in real-time. Timeaveraged integrated backscatter in five dogs was -54 f 2.4 dB (SD). Cyclic variations during the cardiac cycle ranged from 5-10 dB. Both the time-averaged and time-varying features of integrated backscatter are consistent with values obtained with earlier measurement systems that required off-line analysis of data. The real-time data acquisition system developed should facilitate clinical tissue characterization with ultrasonic backscatter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1986) studied Myocardial tissue characterization (n=5). Real-Time Integrated Backscatter Measurement System vs. Earlier measurement systems (off-line analysis) was evaluated on Time-averaged integrated backscatter. A real-time integrated backscatter measurement system yielded a time-averaged integrated backscatter of -54 ± 2.4 dB in 5 dogs, consistent with values from earlier off-line measurement systems.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: