Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most frequent leukemia in Western countries, with an incidence increasing to 30/100 000 per years at an age of >80 years.According to recent International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia guidelines, symptomatic/active disease requires therapeutic interventions aiming to improve overall survival (OS). 1 Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) that has changed the treatment paradigm of both treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients.2 This therapeutic option has high rates of responses but also a not neglectable toxicity in the published clinical trials with accurately selected candidate patients.[3][4][5] Few real-world studies regarding patients treated with ibrutinib are available, integrating the information reported by trials, although not focused on patients that are over 80. [6][7][8][9][10] We aimed to retrospectively evaluate ibrutinib in a cohort of older patients with TN or R/R CLL to retrieve real-world information for safety and effectiveness of the drug.We performed a multicenter, national study enrolling 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with TN or R/R CLL who were ≥80 years old, with a median age of 81 years (range, 80-87 years) at ibrutinib start.Patients starting ibrutinib in label from January 2014 to March 2021 were enrolled from 6 Italian sites (Table 1).Second-generation BTKis were not available as compassionate use or in clinical trials.The median observation period was 27 months, with a maximum of 87.7 months.The study was approved by the Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.A total of 13 patients (21.7%) achieved nodal complete response (CR; bone marrow evaluation not performed), 40 (66.7%)achieved partial response (PR; 88.3% overall response rate), and 7 (11.6%)achieved stable disease (SD).Discontinuation because of progressive disease (PD) occurred mostly in R/R patients and in 1 TN patient, whereas discontinuation because of toxicity occurred in 8 R/R patients and 6 TN patients.Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 51.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.4-56.2),and median OS was 53.2 months (95% CI: 43.3-63.0),as most patients died after PD.Patients achieving a response during ibrutinib experienced a prolonged PFS compared with patients achieving SD (P < .0001).A median PFS of 69.7 months (95% CI: 46.1-93.2) was achieved in patients not experiencing temporary drug withholding (7-30 days), whereas patients who had drug interruptions had a median PFS of 49.7 months (95% CI: 35.4-63.9;P = .079);a total of 10 patients (28.6%) among the 35 patients who did not temporarily suspended ibrutinib then permanently discontinued the drug, and among the 25 patients experiencing drug withholdings, 19 patients (76%) discontinued treatment (Figure 1).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reda et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: