Well-publicized court rulings have found radar speed readings inadmissible as legal evidence, because the radars were operated in such a way as to cast doubt on the accuracy of the readings. Existing devices are, in fact, quite accurate if used within their limitations by trained operators. The problems can be overcome through better training and tighter equipment standards, while some relatively simple technical improvements in the radars can reduce present limitations significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P.D. Fisher (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: