Key result
Specialized evaluation dismisses Long QT syndrome diagnoses in ~16% of referred patients.
Why the study?
Increased awareness and screening for LQTS may contribute to overdiagnosis, and the diagnostic miscues underlying this overdiagnosis remain unclear.
Observational (n=1,841)
No
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“to make hasty diagnosis of a disease that requires life-long treatment is inappropriate, especially when this is done without the support of adequate specific experience.”
“A significantly overestimated QTc was the main reason in 2007 and continues to be a main reason in the current era of these "diagnostic miscues."”
Approximately 16% of patients referred with a diagnosis of Long QT syndrome are misdiagnosed, highlighting the need to critically evaluate QTc intervals, vasovagal syncope, and genetic test validity to prevent overdiagnosis.
BACKGROUND Long QT syndrome (LQTS) predisposes individuals to arrhythmic syncope or seizure, sudden cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Increased physician and public awareness of LQTS-associated warning signs and an increase in electrocardiographic screening programs may contribute to overdiagnosis of LQTS. OBJECTIVES This study sought to identify the diagnostic miscues underlying the continued overdiagnosis of LQTS. METHODS Electronic medical records were reviewed for patients who arrived with an outside diagnosis of LQTS but were dismissed as having normal findings subsequently. Data were abstracted for details on referral, clinical history, and both cardiologic and genetic test results. RESULTS Overall, 290 of 1,841 (16%) patients with original diagnosis of LQTS (174 [60%] female; mean age at first Mayo Clinic evaluation, 22 ± 14 years; mean QTc interval, 427 ± 25 milliseconds) were dismissed as having normal findings. The main cause of LQTS misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis was a prolonged QTc interval secondary to vasovagal syncope (n = 87; 30%), followed by a seemingly positive genetic test result for a variant in 1 of the main LQTS genes (n = 68; 23%) that was ultimately deemed not to be of clinical significance. Furthermore, patients received misdiagnoses because of a positive family history of SCD that was deemed unrelated to LQTS (n = 46; 16%), isolated/transient QT prolongation (n = 44; 15%), or misinterpretation of the QTc interval as a result of inclusion of the U-wave (n = 40, 14%). CONCLUSIONS Knowing the 5 main determinants of discordance between a previously rendered diagnosis of LQTS and full diagnostic reversal or removal (vasovagal syncope, "pseudo"-positive genetic test result in LQTS-causative genes, family history of SCD, transient QT prolongation, and misinterpretation of the QTc interval) increases awareness and provides critical guidance to reduce this burden of overdiagnosed LQTS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bains et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Long QT Syndrome (overdiagnosis) (n=1,841). Outside diagnosis of Long QT syndrome was evaluated on Dismissal of Long QT syndrome diagnosis (normal findings).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: