BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrence risk after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) changes during follow-up, but whether baseline tumor burden remains prognostically relevant with increasing recurrence-free time is unclear. We evaluated the time-dependent prognostic relevance of liver metastasis number. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 226 patients who underwent initial curative-intent hepatectomy for CRLMs between 2007 and 2022. Three-year conditional recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated at surgery and after 6, 12, and 24 months without recurrence. Landmark Cox models evaluated liver metastasis number (< 4 vs. ≥ 4), adjusting for RAS status, with supplementary expanded models. RESULTS: Three-year conditional RFS improved from 27.1% at surgery to 33.3%, 49.3%, and 76.6% after 6, 12, and 24 months without recurrence, respectively. However, subsequent RFS remained worse in patients with ≥ 4 liver metastases at the 6-month (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.94; p = 0.012) and 12-month (HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.08-4.27; p = 0.030) landmarks. In supplementary expanded models, the associations remained directionally similar but were attenuated. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence risk improved with increasing recurrence-free time, but survivors remained heterogeneous according to baseline tumor burden. Liver metastasis number retained prognostic relevance at early postoperative landmarks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: