Background Dementia prevention is a global health priority, yet most large-scale population studies come from Western settings. Japan, a rapidly aging society, provides a unique non-Western epidemiological context for characterizing cognitive decline. Objective To assess whether the Tohoku Medical Megabank (TMM) cohorts replicate established dementia-related associations, and to identify correlates that are statistically significant across three prespecified operational classifications. Methods We analyzed data from >81,000 participants in the TMM cohorts. Participants were classified using (i) self-reported physician-diagnosed dementia and screening-defined impairment using (ii) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≤ 27 and (iii) Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J) ≤ 25. Associations with 14 established dementia-related correlates and >3,800 exploratory variables were assessed using false-discovery-rate control, semantic clustering, and sequential multivariable logistic regression. Results Participants with self-reported dementia had lower MMSE and MoCA-J scores. Established correlates replicated in expected directions for at least one classification, including lower education, hypertension, depressive symptoms, and hearing difficulty. We identified 106 significant correlates across all three classifications; for self-reported dementia, digital device non-use was associated with higher odds (fully adjusted OR up to 2.97, 95% CI: 1.42–6.18), while smartphone use showed inverse associations (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26–0.86); directions were consistent for screening-defined impairment. Conclusions In this study, leveraging existing cognitive classifications available in TMM cohorts, we found that established dementia-related associations largely replicated and identified correlates across three operational classifications. Digital disengagement emerged as a correlate that may reflect early functional change; given the cross-sectional design, causal inference requires further examination. Longitudinal validation with adjudicated diagnoses is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: