Epstein–Barr virus-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (EBV-GEA) is a distinct molecular subtype characterized by recurrent genomic and epigenetic alterations, frequent PD-L1/PD-L2 upregulation, and an immune-enriched tumor microenvironment. These features provide a strong biological rationale for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI); however, clinical evidence remains limited, and EBV positivity is not currently established as an independent predictive biomarker for immunotherapy. We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic EBV-GEA treated with ICI-based regimens at a single tertiary cancer center between January 2016 and August 2025. EBV positivity was confirmed by Epstein–Barr virus-encoded RNA in situ hybridization. Clinical, pathological, treatment, and molecular data were collected. Treatment outcomes included best overall response, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival and disease-free survival when curative-intent surgery was performed. In patients with adequate tumor tissue, the tumor immune microenvironment was exploratorily characterized by immunohistochemical quantification of CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities. Eight patients with EBV-GEA were included. The ORR was 62.5% and the DCR was 75%. No consistent relationship between clinical outcome and HER2, PD-L1, Claudin 18.2 or mismatch repair status was observed. Tumor immune microenvironment assessment was feasible in five patients. Notably, the three patients with the highest CD3+ T-cell densities (>2000 cells/mm2, post hoc threshold) experienced the most favorable clinical outcomes, including two radiological partial responses followed by pathologic complete response and one prolonged partial response. In contrast, CD8+ T-cell density showed greater interpatient variability. ICI-based therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in this small retrospective cohort of EBV-GEA, but benefit was not universal, highlighting substantial clinical and biological heterogeneity within this molecular subtype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaringaño et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: