Bilayer Ni–YSZ fuel electrodes require layer-specific porosity design because support- and functional-layer porosities govern different transport, relative load-bearing, and electrochemical responses. We developed a through-thickness reduced-order model coupling Butler–Volmer kinetics, Bosanquet–Bruggeman layered mass transport, and a dimensionless relative load-bearing proxy. Paired porosity sweeps, four functional-layer porosity–activity mappings, and a 2000-member model ensemble were used for conditional multi-objective screening. The model was checked against a one-dimensional analytical reference and independently implemented in Python and MATLAB/Simulink. The maximum terminal-voltage deviation was 1.3 mV, and the two implementations agreed to double-precision numerical tolerance. The published curve and its approximately digitized counterpart showed the closest agreement over 0.2–0.5 A·cm−2; larger differences outside this interval were attributed to finite image resolution, line width, sparse sampling, and interpolation errors. Increasing support-layer porosity from 0.340 to 0.390 increased normalized effective diffusion by 22.85% but reduced the relative load-bearing proxy from 1.000 to 0.844. Functional-layer porosity produced a conditional low-activation-resistance region near 0.305. The screened candidate intervals were 0.3622–0.3630 for the support layer and 0.3041–0.3067 for the functional layer. These grid-resolved intervals are conditional screening outputs for subsequent validation, not validated design targets or manufacturing tolerances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: