Background/Objectives: Although nutritional status is central to healthy aging, little is known about how it relates to nutrition literacy in community-dwelling older adults. We examined this association and whether it persisted after sequential adjustment for sociodemographic, health-related, and anthropometric characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 306 community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years in Istanbul, Türkiye. Nutritional status and nutrition literacy were assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment–Short Form (MNA-SF) and the Evaluation Instrument of Nutrition Literacy on Adults, respectively. Sociodemographic, perceived health- and nutrition-related, and anthropometric data were collected. Group comparisons, Pearson correlations, and a three-block hierarchical multiple regression analysis were performed. Results: Overall, 4.2% of participants were malnourished and 38.9% were at risk of malnutrition; 8.5% had inadequate and 66.7% had adequate nutrition literacy. Nutrition literacy was weakly and positively correlated with waist-to-hip ratio, mid-upper arm circumference, and calf circumference. Nutrition literacy was positively associated with MNA-SF scores across all hierarchical models, and the final model explained 28.8% of the variance. Sex, employment status, perceived diet quality, calf circumference, and waist circumference were also associated with MNA-SF scores in the final model. However, after additional adjustment for age group and marital status, the association between nutrition literacy and MNA-SF scores was no longer statistically significant. Conclusions: Nutrition literacy was modestly and positively associated with nutritional status after sequential adjustment, but not after additional adjustment for age group and marital status. Given the cross-sectional design, the direction of this association cannot be established, and no inferences regarding interventions can be drawn. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify its temporal nature and underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altınok et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: